Why Develop-Operate-Transition Projects Need to Get the DevOps Treatment

It has been the determination of the DevOps methodology from day one to break down the silos and increase overall collaboration with various teams of the IT industry. The IT industry has gathered the proper insight from using the DevOps systems and did a fine job in providing a layout construct for development, operation and transition of the projects. It was hoped in the past that all the systems related with DevOps, one way or the other, couldn’t be automated at once and that different set of instructions was required to do so.

But DevOps has certainly changed the concepts of the past and has put forth a new dimension travelling into which IT companies and industry as a whole were able to solve their collaborative issues and accelerate development, operations and transition state of the projects they were working on. Yet to this date there are a number of IT industries and teams that don’t feel the need to automate or treat every aspect of their business i.e. development, operations and transition with DevOps.

Microsoft has initiated their own personal DevOps related course which can help the professionals to tackle the challenges of today and construct better aptitudes around the most recent of them. This is why it is recommended that professionals seeking abrupt support from DevOps should acquire the latest Microsoft azure DevOps certification.

DOT Structure and its relation with DevOps

DOT corresponds to the development, operation and integration of the technical systems and processes while using DevOps along with it. Following are some of the settings which closely represents the problems and issues faced by professionals during their struggle to build up the DOT structure;

• During the development phase of things, the teams are usually large and they have to deal with a lot of complex problems too. As the problems evolve so should the solutions to these problems.
• When things move to the operate section the changes that need to be made are relatively simple and the application which was developed in its earliest phase is somewhat stable.
• Following up the stages of development and operation, the application continues to become more and more stable and less changes are required. Also, the complexity of the systems continues to fade away.
• Then at some point in time the applications become too old and weary and new updates and systems have already been made available, that is when decommissioning of the application begins because a life cycle has reached its end, the end of the road.

This the perfect example of the life cycle that is adopted while looking at the development, operate and transition of the systems. And this is where the concept of DevOps must be applied to expand the span of the life cycle, making all the processes more and more stable, and off to a great journey while backed up with DevOps tactics and scenarios. All these questions or problems that are listed above can be best answered with the help of the DevOps systems in following ways;

• During the development phase of the systems, an organization can have the liberty to engage with a team of highly skilled IT professionals. These professionals having adopted to the DevOps systems have the agenda of moving forward with agility, developing the applications in a professional way and yet dealing with the complexity of designing an application totally from the beginning. They go through the process without having any hint or professional insight from others. The organization is then bound to pay heavy rates for this active service by the professionals.
• When the organization reach the operate phase of the application development, they should hire fewer demanding professionals because there is less complexity to deal with here and the cost profile for the project can also be reduced to a minimum level.
• When the application starts getting much more stable than it was the first time around, the usage of the professionals is even more reduced for taking the control of the systems for in-house usage, that is called transition phase.

Getting clear every step of the way

If the construct was to be developed keeping in view of the DevOps phase, there are two different vendors that are needed to be brought into perspective. The first vendor is the development vendor, the person who is developing the application, and the next vendor is the professional from the industry’s side who is taking control of the settings when passed down from the developmental professional. This way a lot of settings are not properly integrated by the development based professionals and the systems is left vulnerable and not properly optimized to be used by the next professionals/vendors.

The idea of the development based vendors is to develop the systems and the products along with it so that these can be passed on to the next professionals. They don’t have any concern for how would the next professionals or vendors would use or stabilize the product or application. But on the other hand the operate vendors are totally concerned with the idea of running the products and applications smoothly and supporting the optimization of the products and services.

With the help of the DevOps systems the idea of implementing and developing the applications becomes much more easy. Here the professionals are not only concerned with the idea of completing the job of application development but also integrating various controls that make the use of applications convenient for the next in line vendors. Also, the operate and integration can become much easier than ever before, because DevOps would solely rely on the idea of eradicating the silos and putting away any communication related barriers.        

The professionals that undergo the development and then transition of the projects have solid background in the fields of IT and cyber security. Many of them have even acquired the Linux DevOps Certification, helping them develop execute proper understanding around the subject. That is why anyone not having these credentials won’t be welcomed by the industry to work on application development and integration.